SEC Filing (NYSE:EXR) | Extra Space Storage Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

or

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 001-32269

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		20-1076777
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2795 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 400
Salt Lake City, Utah 84121
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (801) 562-5556

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of October 31, 2007 was 65,299,160.

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION	3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	4

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	4

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	24

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	36

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	37

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	37

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	37

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	37

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	37

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	38

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	38

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	38

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	39

SIGNATURES	39

STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain information set forth in this report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other information that is not historical information. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” or “intends” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. We may also make additional forward-looking statements from time to time. All such subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, by us or on our behalf, are also expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends and estimate of future earnings, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but there can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs and projections will result or be achieved. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this report. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risks referenced in “Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors” below and in “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such factors include, but are not limited to:

• changes in general economic conditions and in the markets in which we operate;

• the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities or other storage alternatives, which could cause rents and occupancy rates to decline;

• potential liability for uninsured losses and environmental contamination;

• difficulties in our ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired and developed properties into our existing operations and to lease up those properties, which could adversely affect our profitability;

• the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state, and local laws and regulations including, without limitation, those governing real estate investment trusts, which could increase our expenses and reduce our cash available for distribution;

• difficulties in raising capital at reasonable rates, which could impede our ability to grow;

• delays in the development and construction process, which could adversely affect our profitability; and

• economic uncertainty due to the impact of war or terrorism, which could adversely affect our business plan.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)

	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Assets:
Real estate assets:
Net operating real estate assets	$	1,707,384		$	1,382,055
Real estate under development	49,943			35,336
Net real estate assets	1,757,327			1,417,391

Investments in real estate ventures	89,876			88,115
Cash and cash equivalents	41,830			70,801
Short-term investments	49,200			—
Restricted cash	36,642			44,282
Receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures	9,447			15,880
Other assets, net	35,253			33,356
Total assets	$	2,019,575		$	1,669,825

Liabilities, Minority Interests and Stockholders’ Equity:
Notes payable	$	902,930		$	828,584
Notes payable to trusts	119,590			119,590
Exchangeable senior notes	250,000			—
Line of credit	—			—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	33,951			25,704
Other liabilities	18,416			17,234
Total liabilities	1,324,887			991,112

Commitments and contingencies

Minority interest represented by Preferred Operating Partnership units, net of $100,000 note receivable (Note 15)	30,427			—
Minority interest in Operating Partnership	36,807			34,841
Other minority interests	164			317

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock , $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 and 200,000,000 shares authorized at September 30,2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and 65,276,108 and 64,167,098 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 respectively	653			642
Paid-in capital	825,130			822,181
Accumulated deficit	(198,493		)	(179,268		)
Total stockholders’ equity	627,290			643,555

Total liabilities, minority interests and stockholders’ equity	$	2,019,575		$	1,669,825

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006

Revenues:
Property rental	$	55,209		$	44,682		$	149,832		$	125,877
Management and franchise fees	5,169			5,357			15,520			15,697
Tenant insurance	3,027			716			7,858			2,608
Development fees	97			47			334			272
Other income	324			386			608			635
Total revenues	63,826			51,188			174,152			145,089

Expenses:
Property operations	19,607			16,613			53,855			46,603
Tenant insurance	1,397			284			3,587			1,506
Unrecovered development and acquisition costs	184			(87		)	593			255
General and administrative	9,326			8,598			27,534			26,590
Depreciation and amortization	10,598			9,253			28,517			27,586
Total expenses	41,112			34,661			114,086			102,540

Income before interest, Preferred Operating Partnership, minority interests and equity in earnings of real estate ventures	22,714			16,527			60,066			42,549

Interest expense	(16,079		)	(13,429		)	(44,912		)	(38,198		)
Interest income	1,821			175			6,937			805
Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Unit holder	1,280			—			1,280			—
Equity in earnings of real estate ventures	1,304			1,340			3,693			3,566
Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units (Note 15)	1,054			—			1,054			—
Minority interest - Operating Partnership	(869		)	(306		)	(1,768		)	(585		)
Minority interests - other	113			—			153			—
Net income	11,338			4,307			26,503			8,137
Fixed distribution paid to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder (Note 15)	(1,510		)	—			(1,510		)	—
Net income available to common stockholders	$	9,828		$	4,307		$	24,993		$	8,137

Net income per common share
Basic	$	0.15		$	0.08		$	0.39		$	0.16
Diluted	$	0.15		$	0.08		$	0.38		$	0.16

Weighted average number of shares
Basic	64,901,249			52,501,864			64,461,353			51,929,336
Diluted	70,567,078			57,072,838			69,702,837			56,250,164

Cash dividends paid per common share	$	0.23		$	0.23		$	0.68		$	0.68

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)

	Common Stock				Paid-in		Accumulated			Total Stockholders’
	Shares		Par Value		Capital		Deficit			Equity
Balances at December 31, 2006	64,167,098		642		822,181		(179,268		)	643,555

Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options	99,290		1		1,338		—			1,339
Restricted stock grants issued	119,329		1		—		—			1
Restricted stock grants cancelled	(2,607	)	—		—		—			—
Conversion of Contingent Conversion Shares to common stock	892,998		9		—		—			9
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards	—		—		1,611		—			1,611

Fixed distribution paid to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder	—		—		—		(1,510		)	(1,510		)
Net income	—		—		—		26,503			26,503
Dividends paid on common stock at $0.6825 per share	—		—		—		(44,218		)	(44,218		)
Balances at September 30, 2007	65,276,108		$	653	$	825,130	$	(198,493	)	$	627,290

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	26,503		$	8,137
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	28,517			27,586
Amortization of deferred financing costs	2,457			2,111
Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units (Note 15)	(1,054		)	—
Stock compensation expense	1,611			1,377
Income allocated to minority interests	1,615			585
Distributions from operations of real estate ventures in excess of earnings	3,454			3,423
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables from related parties	4,835			16,619
Other assets	5,045			3,607
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	8,247			(6,485		)
Other liabilities	(2,378		)	3,756
Net cash provided by operating activities	78,852			60,716

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of real estate assets	(144,347		)	(127,826		)
Development and construction of real estate assets	(31,495		)	(26,301		)
Proceeds from sale of real estate assets	1,999			728
Investments in real estate ventures	(4,769		)	(5,104		)
Net purchases of short-term investments	(49,200		)	—
Change in restricted cash	7,640			1,451
Principal payments received on notes receivable	—			123
Purchase of equipment and fixtures	(835		)	(1,217		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(221,007		)	(158,146		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exchangeable senior notes	250,000			—
Proceeds from notes payable, notes payable to trusts and line of credit	50,102			129,126
Principal payments on notes payable and line of credit	(31,135		)	(65,213		)
Deferred financing costs	(7,740		)	(899		)
Loan to Preferred OP unit holder	(100,000		)	—
Redemption of Operating Partnership units held by minority interest	(775		)	—
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net	—			194,901
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options	1,339			565
Dividends paid on common stock	(44,218		)	(35,407		)
Distributions to Operating Partnership units held by minority interest	(4,389		)	(2,610		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	113,184			220,463
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(28,971		)	123,033
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period	70,801			28,653
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	41,830		$	151,686

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	37,756		$	35,379

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Acquisitions:
Real estate assets acquired	$	190,185		$	27,091
Notes payable acquired	(54,350		)	(10,878		)
Notes receivable	—			(10,298		)
Preferred Operating Partnership units issued as consideration	(131,499		)	—
Investment in real estate ventures	(502		)	(2,785		)
Minority interest in Operating Partnership	(3,834		)	(3,130		)
Conversion of Operating Parntership Units held by minority interests for common stock	—			1,811

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Amounts in thousands, except share data

1. ORGANIZATION

Extra Space Storage Inc. (the “Company”) is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”), formed as a Maryland corporation on April 30, 2004 to own, operate, manage, acquire and develop self-storage facilities located throughout the United States. The Company continues the business of Extra Space Storage LLC and its subsidiaries, which had engaged in the self-storage business since 1977. The Company’s interest in its properties is held through its operating partnership, Extra Space Storage LP (the “Operating Partnership”), which was formed on May 5, 2004. The Company’s primary assets are general partner and limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT. The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To the extent the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it will not be subject to tax, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to its stockholders.

The Company invests in self-storage facilities by acquiring or developing wholly-owned facilities or facilities held through joint ventures with third parties. At September 30, 2007, the Company had direct and indirect equity interests in 585 storage facilities located in 33 states and Washington, D.C.

The Company operates in two distinct segments: (1) property management, acquisition and development; and (2) rental operations. The Company’s property management, acquisition and development activities include managing, acquiring, developing and selling self-storage facilities. The rental operations activities include rental operations of self-storage facilities. No single tenant accounts for more than 5% of rental income.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Certain amounts in the 2006 financial statements and supporting note disclosures have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassification did not impact previously reported net income or accumulated deficit.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Topic D-109, “Determining the Nature of a Host Contract Related to a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share under FASB Statement No. 133” (“Topic D-109”), discussed at the March 15, 2007 EITF meeting, is effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2007 (even if that period is other than the first fiscal quarter of the registrant’s fiscal year). Topic D-109 provides the SEC staff’s view as to how one must evaluate whether a preferred stock “host” contract is a debt host or an equity host. It states that the determination of the nature of the host contract for a hybrid financial instrument (that is, whether the nature of the host contract is more akin to debt or to equity) issued in the form of a share should be based on a consideration of economic characteristics and risks. The SEC staff believes that the consideration of the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract should be based on all the stated and implied substantive terms and features of the hybrid financial instrument. This may represent a change from the way these instruments were analyzed in the past.

The Company elected to early adopt Topic D-109 which specifically relates to the AAAAA Rent-A-Space acquisition that was completed during the quarter ended June 30, 2007. See Note 15.

3. NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding, less non-vested restricted stock. Diluted earnings per common share measures the performance of the Company over the reporting period while giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding during the period. The denominator includes the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares that were dilutive had been issued and is calculated using either the treasury stock or if converted method. Potential common shares are securities (such as options, warrants, convertible debt, Contingent Conversion Shares (“CCS”), Contingent Conversion Units (“CCU”), exchangeable Series A Participating Redeemable Preferred Operating Partnership units (“Preferred OP units”) and convertible Operating Partnership units ) (“OP units”) that do not have a current right to participate in earnings but could do so in the future by virtue of their option or conversion right. In computing the dilutive effect of convertible securities, net income or loss is adjusted to add back any changes in earnings in the period associated with the convertible security. The numerator also is adjusted for the effects of any other non-discretionary changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion of those potential common shares. In computing diluted earnings per share, only potential common shares that are dilutive, those that reduce earnings per share, are included.

The Company has $250.0 million of exchangeable senior notes issued and outstanding that also can potentially have a dilutive effect on its earnings per share calculations. The exchangeable senior notes are exchangeable by holders into shares of the Company’s common stock under certain circumstances per the terms of the indenture governing the exchangeable senior notes. The exchangeable senior notes are not exchangeable unless the price of the Company’s common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable exchange price for a specified period during a quarter, or unless certain other events occur. The exchange price was $23.48 per share at September 30, 2007, and could change over time as described in the indenture. The price of the Company’s common stock did not exceed 130% of the exchange price for the specified period of time during the third quarter of 2007, therefore holders of the exchangeable senior notes may not elect to convert them during the fourth quarter of 2007.

The Company has irrevocably agreed to pay only cash for the accreted principal amount of the exchangeable senior notes relative to its exchange obligations, but has retained the right to satisfy the exchange obligations in excess of the accreted principal amount in cash and/or common stock. Though the Company has retained that right, FAS 128, Earnings Per Share, requires an assumption that shares will be used to pay the exchange obligations in excess of the accreted principal amount, and requires that those shares be included in the Company’s calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share computation. No shares were included in the computation at September 30, 2007 because there was no excess over the accreted principal for the period.

For the purposes of computing the diluted impact on earnings per share of the potential conversion of Preferred OP units into common shares, where the Company has the option to redeem in cash or shares as discussed in Note 15 and where the Company has stated the positive intent and ability to settle at least $115 million of the instrument in cash (or net settle a portion of the Preferred OP units against the related outstanding note receivable), only the amount of the instrument in excess of $115 million is considered in the calculation of shares contingently issuable for the purposes of computing diluted earnings per share as allowed by paragraph 29 of FAS 128.

For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, options to purchase approximately 1,184,978 and 18,511 shares of common stock, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, options to purchase approximately 256,506 and 66,560 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The computation of net income per share is as follows:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net income available to common stockholders	$	9,828	$	4,307	$	24,993	$	8,137
Add:
Income allocated to minority interest - Preferred and Common Operating Partnership	869		306		1,768		585
Net income for diluted computations	$	10,697	$	4,613	$	26,761	$	8,722

Weighted average common shares oustanding:
Average number of common shares outstanding - basic	64,901,249		52,501,864		64,461,353		51,929,336
Operating Partnership units	4,025,332		3,737,579		4,025,332		3,796,384
Preferred Operating Partnership units	961,839		—		340,561		—
Dilutive stock options, restricted stock and CCS/CCU conversions	678,658		833,395		875,591		524,444
Average number of common shares outstanding - diluted	70,567,078		57,072,838		69,702,837		56,250,164

Net income per common share
Basic	$	0.15	$	0.08	$	0.39	$	0.16

Diluted	$	0.15	$	0.08	$	0.38	$	0.16

4. REAL ESTATE ASSETS

The components of real estate assets are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006

Land	$	442,882		$	361,569
Buildings and improvements	1,347,832			1,085,269
Intangible assets - tenant relationships	31,194			25,436
Intangible lease rights	6,150			3,400
	1,828,058			1,475,674
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	(120,674		)	(93,619		)
Net operating real estate assets	1,707,384			1,382,055
Real estate under development	49,943			35,336
Net real estate assets	$	1,757,327		$	1,417,391

On August 3, 2007, the Company sold an undeveloped parcel of vacant land in Kendall, Florida for its book value of $1,999. There was no gain or loss recognized on the sale.

5. PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS

The following table shows the Company’s acquisition of operating properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and does not include purchases of raw land or improvements made to existing assets:

									Net
									Liabilities /					Number of
	Number of	Date of	Total				Loan		(Assets)			Value of OP		OP Units
Property Location(s)	Properties	Acquisition	Consideration		Cash Paid		Assumed		Assumed			Units Issued		Issued	Source of Acquisition	Notes

Alabama (1), Colorado(1), Indiana (1), Missouri (3),New Mexico (1)	7	8/31/07	$	36,510	$	13,558	$	23,340	$	(388	)	$	—	—	Affiliated joint venture
Maryland	1	8/31/07	10,471		10,418		—		53			—		—	Affiliated joint venture
California	1	8/1/2007	14,686		4,915		—		5			9,766		80,905	Unrelated third party	(1	)
California	1	6/26/2007	11,216		196		2,822		1			8,197		61,398	Unrelated third party	(1	)
California (6) & Hawaii (2)	8	6/25/2007	126,623		11,154		—		1,933			113,536		847,677	Unrelated third party	(1	)
Georgia	3	6/14/2007	13,693		13,594		—		99			—		—	Unrelated franchisee
California	1	6/14/2007	18,703		867		14,062		(60		)	3,834		218,693	Unrelated third party	(2	)
Maryland	1	6/6/2007	14,942		8,128		6,834		(20		)	—		—	Unrelated third party
California	1	6/1/2007	4,020		4,036		—		(16		)	—		—	Unrelated third party
Florida	1	5/31/2007	8,975		8,882		—		93			—		—	Unrelated third party
California	1	5/24/2007	5,585		5,575		—		10			—		—	Unrelated third party
Maryland	1	4/17/2007	12,670		5,428		7,292		(50		)	—		—	Unrelated third party
Florida	1	3/27/2007	6,320		6,257		—		63			—		—	Unrelated franchisee
Maryland	1	1/11/2007	14,334		14,348		—		(14		)	—		—	Unrelated franchisee
Tennessee	1	1/5/2007	3,684		3,672		—		12			—		—	Unrelated franchisee
Arizona	1	1/2/2007	4,361		4,527		—		(166		)	—		—	Affiliated joint venture

Total	31		$	306,793	$	115,555	$	54,350	$	1,555		$	135,333	1,208,673

Notes:

(1) - Preferred Operating Partnership Units

(2) - Common Operating Partnership Units

6. INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE VENTURES

Investments in real estate ventures consisted of the following:

	Excess Profit		Equity		Investment balance at
	Participation %		Ownership %		September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006

Extra Space West One LLC (“ESW”)	40	%	5	%	$	1,796	$	1,918
Extra Space Northern Properties Six, LLC (“ESNPS”)	35	%	10	%	1,701		1,757
PRISA Self Storage LLC (“PRISA”)	17	%	2	%	12,791		13,393
PRISA II Self Storage LLC (“PRISA II”)	17	%	2	%	10,781		10,821
PRISA III Self Storage LLC (“PRISA III”)	20	%	5	%	4,436		4,534
VRS Self Storage LLC (“VRS”)	20	%	5	%	4,542		4,547
WCOT Self Storage LLC (“WCOT”)	20	%	5	%	5,236		5,287
Storage Portfolio I, LLC (“SP I”)	40	%	25	%	18,708		19,260
Storage Portfolio Bravo II (“SPB II”)	45	%	20	%	14,822		15,264
U-Storage de Mexico S.A. and related entities	30-40	%	30-40	%	4,958		—
Other minority owned properties	10-50	%	10-50	%	10,105		11,334
					$	89,876	$	88,115

In these joint ventures, the Company and the joint venture partner generally receive a preferred return on their invested capital. To the extent that cash/profits in excess of these preferred returns are generated through operations or capital transactions, the Company would receive a higher percentage of the excess cash/profits than its equity interest.

On March 1, 2007, the Company acquired a 39.5% interest in U-Storage de Mexico S.A., an existing Mexican corporation (“U-Storage”), which currently manages, develops, owns and operates self storage facilities in Mexico. Kenneth T. Woolley, a former Senior Vice President of the Company and son of Kenneth M. Woolley, the CEO of the Company, also acquired a 0.5% interest in U-Storage de Mexico S.A.

The components of equity in earnings of real estate ventures consist of the following:

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006		2007			2006

Equity in earnings of ESW	$	411		$	337	$	1,106		$	1,018
Equity in earnings of ESNPS	49			39		136			113
Equity in earnings of PRISA	166			138		521			394
Equity in earnings of PRISA II	153			110		430			334
Equity in earnings of PRISA III	86			35		220			88
Equity in earnings of VRS	67			43		190			119
Equity in earnings of WCOT	77			40		224			114
Equity in earnings of SP I	333			291		785			740
Equity in earnings of SPB II	189			210		560			599
Equity in earnings (losses) of U-Storage and related entities	(141		)	—		(221		)	—
Equity in earnings (losses) of other minority owned properties	(86		)	97		(258		)	47
	$	1,304		$	1,340	$	3,693		$	3,566

Equity in earnings of SP I and SPB II includes the amortization of the Company’s excess purchase price of approximately $22 million of these equity investments over its original basis. The excess basis is amortized over 40 years.

7. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company accounts for its investments in debt and equity securities according to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, which requires securities classified as “available-for-sale” to be stated at fair value. Adjustments to fair value of available-for-sale securities are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. A decline in the market value of investment securities below cost, that is deemed to be other than temporary, results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. At September 30, 2007, the Company had $49,200 in highly-liquid auction rate securities (“ARS”), government and corporate bonds and variable rate demand notes classified as available-for-sale securities. Although these ARS have long-term stated contractual maturities, they can be presented for redemption at auction when rates are reset which is typically every 7, 28 or 35 days. The Company had no realized or unrealized gains or losses related to these securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. All income related to these investments was recorded as interest income. In accordance with the Company’s investment policy, the Company only invests in ARS with high credit quality issuers and limits the amount of investment exposure to any one issuer.

8. OTHER ASSETS

The components of other assets are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006

Equipment and fixtures	$	11,918		$	11,083
Less: accumulated depreciation	(8,042		)	(6,564		)
Deferred financing costs, net	15,132			10,511
Prepaid expenses and deposits	5,240			5,139
Accounts receivable, net	7,192			9,373
Investments in Trusts	3,590			3,590
Other	223			224
	$	35,253		$	33,356

9. NOTES PAYABLE

The components of notes payable are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Fixed Rate
Mortgage and construction loans with banks bearing interest at fixed rates between 4.65% and 8.33%. The loans are collateralized by mortgages on real estate assets and the assignment of rents. Principal and interest payments are made monthly with all outstanding principal and interest due between March 1, 2008 and January 1, 2023.	$	810,009	$	743,511

Variable Rate
Mortgage and construction loans with banks bearing floating interest rates (including loans subject to interest rate swaps) based on LIBOR. Interest rates are between LIBOR plus 0.65% (5.77% and 6.01% at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively) and LIBOR plus 2.00% (7.12% and 7.35% at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively). The loans are collateralized by mortgages on real estate assets and the assignment of rents. Principal and interest payments are made monthly with all outstanding principal and interest due between December 31, 2008 and March 1, 2011.	92,921		85,073

	$	902,930	$	828,584

Real estate assets are pledged as collateral for the notes payable. The Company is subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to the outstanding notes payable. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2007.

In October 2004, the Company entered into a reverse interest rate swap agreement (“Swap Agreement”) to float $61,770 of 4.30% fixed interest rate secured notes due in September 2009. Under this Swap Agreement, the Company will receive interest at a fixed rate of 4.30% and pay interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 0.65%. The Swap Agreement matures at the same time the notes are due. This Swap Agreement is a fair value hedge, as defined by SFAS No. 133, and the fair value of the Swap Agreement is recorded as an asset or liability, with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the related note payable. Monthly variable interest payments are recognized as an increase or decrease in interest expense.

The estimated fair value of the Swap Agreement at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was reflected as an other liability of $896 and $1,925, respectively. The Company recorded additional interest expense relating to the Swap Agreement of $273 and $258 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Interest expense was increased by $798 and $540 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

On August 31, 2007, as part of the acquisition of our partner’s joint venture interest in seven properties, the Company assumed an interest rate cap agreement related to the assumption of the loan on these properties. The Company has designated the interest rate cap agreement as a cash flow hedge of the interest payments resulting from an increase in the interest rate above the rates designated in the interest rate cap agreement. The interest rate cap agreement will allow increases in interest payments based on an increase in the LIBOR rate above the capped rates (5.19% from 1/1/07 to 12/31/07 and 5.48% from 1/1/08 to 12/31/08) on $23,340 of floating rate debt to be offset by the value of the interest rate cap agreement. The Company is in the process of valuing the hedge as part of the purchase accounting and related allocation for the seven properties.

10. NOTES PAYABLE TO TRUSTS

During July 2005, ESS Statutory Trust III (the “Trust III”), a newly formed Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned, unconsolidated subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, issued an aggregate of $40.0 million of preferred securities which mature on July 31, 2035. In addition, the Trust III issued 1,238 of Trust common securities to the Operating Partnership for a purchase price of $1.2 million. On July 27, 2005, the proceeds from the sale of the preferred and common securities of $41.2 million were loaned in the form of a note to the Operating Partnership (“Note 3”). Note 3 has a fixed rate of 6.91% through July 31, 2010, and then will be payable at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.40% per annum. The interest on Note 3, payable quarterly, will be used by the Trust III to pay dividends on the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed by the Trust with no prepayment premium after July 27, 2010.

During May 2005, ESS Statutory Trust II (the “Trust II”), a newly formed Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned, unconsolidated subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, issued an aggregate of $41.0 million of preferred securities which

mature on June 30, 2035. In addition, the Trust II issued 1,269 of Trust common securities to the Operating Partnership for a purchase price of $1.3 million. On May 24, 2005, the proceeds from the sale of the preferred and common securities of $42.3 million were loaned in the form of a note to the Operating Partnership (“Note 2”). Note 2 has a fixed rate of 6.67% through June 30, 2010, and then will be payable at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.40% per annum.

The interest on Note 2, payable quarterly, will be used by the Trust II to pay dividends on the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed by the Trust with no prepayment premium after June 30, 2010.

During April 2005, ESS Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), a newly formed Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned, unconsolidated subsidiary of the Operating Partnership issued an aggregate of $35.0 million of trust preferred securities which mature on June 30, 2035. In addition, the Trust issued 1,083 of trust common securities to the Operating Partnership for a purchase price of $1.1 million. On April 8, 2005, the proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred and common securities of $36.1 million were loaned in the form of a note to the Operating Partnership (the “Note”). The Note has a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum. The interest on the Note, payable quarterly, will be used by the Trust to pay dividends on the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed by the Trust with no prepayment premium after June 30, 2010.

The Company follows Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Intrepretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”), which addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Under FIN 46R, Trust, Trust II and Trust III are VIEs that are not consolidated because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. A debt obligation has been recorded in the form of notes as discussed above for the proceeds, which are owed to the Trust, Trust II, and Trust III by the Company.

11. EXCHANGEABLE SENIOR NOTES

On March 27, 2007, our Operating Partnership issued $250.0 million of its 3.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due April 1, 2027 (the “Notes”). Costs incurred to issue the Notes were approximately $5.7 million. These costs are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over five years, which represents the estimated term of the Notes, and are included in other assets, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2007. The Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Operating Partnership and are fully guaranteed by the Company. Interest is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year beginning October 1, 2007 until the maturity date of April 1, 2027. The Notes bear interest at 3.625% per annum and contain an exchange settlement feature, which provides that the Notes may, under certain circumstances, be exchangeable for cash (up to the principal amount of the Notes) and, with respect to any excess exchange value, for cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock at an initial exchange rate of approximately 42.5822 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes at the option of the Operating Partnership.

The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes at any time to preserve the Company’s status as a REIT. In addition, on or after April 5, 2012, the Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes for cash, in whole or in part, at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, upon at least 30 days but not more than 60 days prior written notice to holders of the Notes.

The holders of the Notes have the right to require the Operating Partnership to repurchase the Notes for cash, in whole or in part, on each of April 1, 2012, April 1, 2017 and April 1, 2022, and upon the occurrence of a designated event, in each case for a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. Certain events are considered “Events of Default,” as defined in the indenture governing the Notes, which may result in the accelerated maturity of the Notes.

The Company has considered whether the exchange settlement feature represents an embedded derivative within the debt instrument under the guidance of FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, EITF 90-19 Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash Upon Conversion, and EITF 01-6 The Meaning of “Indexed to a Company’s Own Stock” that would require bifurcation (i.e., separate accounting). The Company has concluded that the exchange settlement feature has satisfied the exemption in SFAS 133 because it is indexed to the Company’s own stock and would otherwise be classified in stockholders equity, among other considerations. Accordingly, the Notes are presented as a single debt instrument (often referred to as “Instrument C” in EITF 90-19) in accordance with APB 14 Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants due to the inseparability of the debt and the conversion feature.

12. LINE OF CREDIT

The Company, as guarantor, and its Operating Partnership had entered into a $100.0 million revolving line of credit in September 2004, which included a $10.0 million swingline subfacility (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility had an interest rate of 175 basis points over LIBOR (6.87% and 7.10% at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively), and was collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets. No amounts were outstanding on the line of credit at September 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006. The Credit Facility expired on September 30, 2007.

On October 19, 2007, the Company entered into a new $100.0 million revolving line of credit (the “Credit Line”). The Company intends to use the proceeds of the Credit Line for general corporate purposes. The Credit Line has an interest rate of between 100 and 250 basis points over LIBOR, depending on certain financial ratios of the Company. The Credit Line is collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets. As of the closing date, the Credit Line had approximately $97 million of capacity based on the assets collateralizing the Credit Line. The Credit Line matures October 31, 2010.

13. OTHER LIABILITIES

The components of other liabilities are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006

Deferred rental income	$	11,622	$	9,224
Security deposits	401		291
SUSA lease obligation liability	2,655		2,838
Fair value of interest rate swap	896		1,925
Other miscellaneous liabilities	2,842		2,956
	$	18,416	$	17,234

14. RELATED PARTY AND AFFILIATED REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS

The Company provides management and development services for certain joint ventures, franchise, third party and other related party properties. Management agreements generally provide for management fees of 6% of cash collected from properties for the management of operations at the self-storage facilities. The Company earns development fees of 4%-6% of budgeted costs on developmental projects.

Management fee revenue for related party and affiliated real estate joint ventures is summarized as follows:

		Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Entity	Type	2007		2006		2007		2006

ESW	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	$	110	$	103	$	328	$	307
ESNPS	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	113		110		329		316
PRISA	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	1,273		1,289		3,868		3,780
PRISA II	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	1,052		1,038		3,142		3,056
PRISA III	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	475		476		1,417		1,384
VRS	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	292		285		860		838
WCOT	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	387		373		1,155		1,096
SP I	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	319		309		945		910
SPB II	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	254		260		770		777
Extra Space Development ("ESD")	Related party	193		129		548		333
Various	Franchisees, third parties and other	701		985		2,158		2,900
		$	5,169	$	5,357	15,520		15,697

Development fee revenue for related party and affiliated real estate joint ventures is summarized as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Type	2007		2006		2007		2006
Affiliated real estate joint ventures	$	97	$	16	$	334	$	163
Related party	—		31		—		109
	$	97	$	47	$	334	$	272

Effective January 1, 2004, the Company entered into a license agreement with Centershift, a related party software provider, to secure a perpetual right for continued use of STORE (the site management software used at all sites operated by the Company) in all aspects of the Company’s property acquisition, development, redevelopment and operational activities. The Company paid Centershift $225 and $185 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $680 and $549 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, relating to the purchase of software and to license agreements.

Related party and affiliated real estate joint ventures balances are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Receivables:
Development fees	$	2,562	$	2,633
Other receivables from properties	6,885		13,247
	$	9,447	$	15,880

Other receivables from properties consist of amounts due for management fees and expenses paid by the Company on behalf of the managed properties. The Company believes that all of these related party and affiliated joint venture receivables are fully collectible. The Company did not have any payables to related parties at September 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006.

15. MINORITY INTEREST REPRESENTED BY PREFERRED OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS

On June 15, 2007, the Operating Partnership entered into a Contribution Agreement with various limited partnerships affiliated with AAAAA Rent-A-Space to acquire ten self-storage facilities (the “Properties”) in exchange for the issuance of newly designated Preferred OP Units of the Operating Partnership. The self-storage facilities are located in California and Hawaii.

On June 25 and 26, 2007, nine of the ten properties were contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for consideration totaling $137.8 million. Preferred OP units totaling 909,075, with a value of $121.7 million, were issued along with the assumption of approximately $14.2 million of third-party debt, of which $11.4 million was paid off at close. The final property was contributed on August 1, 2007 in exchange for consideration totaling $14.7 million. 80,905 Preferred OP Units with a value of $9.8 million were issued along with $4.9 million of cash.

On June 25, 2007, the Company loaned the holders of the Preferred OP Units $100.0 million. The note receivable bears interest at 4.85%, and is due September 1, 2017. The loan is secured by the borrower’s Preferred OP Units. The holders of the Preferred OP Units can convert up to 114,500 Preferred OP Units prior to the maturity date of the loan. If any redemption in excess of 114,500 Preferred OP Units occurs prior to the maturity date, the holder of the Preferred OP Unit is required to repay the loan as of the date of that Preferred OP Unit redemption. Preferred OP Units are shown on the balance sheet net of the $100.0 million loan under the guidance in EITF No. 85-1, Classifying Notes Receivable for Capital because the borrower under the loan receivable is also the holder of the Preferred OP Units.

The Operating Partnership entered into a Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”) which provides for the designation and issuance of the Preferred OP Units. The Preferred OP Units will have priority over all other partnership interests of the Operating Partnership with respect to distributions and liquidation.

Per the Partnership Agreement, Preferred OP Units in the amount of $115.0 million bear a fixed priority return of 5% and have a fixed liquidation value of $115.0 million. The remaining balance will participate in distributions with and have a

liquidation value equal to that of the common Operating Partnership units. The Preferred OP Units will be redeemable at the option of the holder on or after September 1, 2008, which redemption obligation may be satisfied, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of its common stock.

At issuance, in accordance with SFAS 133: Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, SFAS 150: Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, EITF 00-19: Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, EITF Topic D-109: Determining the Nature of a Host Contract Related to a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share under FASB Statement No. 133: and Accounting Series Release (“ASR”) No. 268: Presentation in Financial Statements of “Redeemable Preferred Stocks, from inception through September 28, 2007 (the date of the amendment discussed below), the Preferred OP Units were classified as a hybrid instrument such that the value of the units associated with the fixed return were classified in mezzanine after total liabilities on the balance sheet and before stockholders’ equity. The remaining balance that participates in distributions equal to that of common OP Units had been identified as an embedded derivative and had been classified as a liability on the balance sheet and recorded at fair value on a quarterly basis with any adjustment being recorded to the income statement. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the fair value adjustment associated with the embedded derivative was $1,054.

On September 28, 2007, the Operating Partnership entered into an amendment to the Contribution Agreement. Pursuant to the amendment, the maximum number of shares that can be issued upon redemption of the Preferred OP Units was set at 116 million, after which the Company will have no further obligations with respect to the redeemed or any other remaining Preferred OP Units. As a result of this amendment, and in accordance with the above referenced guidance, the Preferred OP Units are no longer considered a hybrid instrument and the previously identified embedded derivative no longer requires bifurcation and is considered permanent equity of the Operating Partnership and is included on the balance sheet as the minority interest represented by Preferred Operating Partnership units.

16. MINORITY INTEREST IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

The Company’s interest in its properties is held through the Operating Partnership. ESS Holding Business Trust I, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Company, through ESS Holding Business Trust II, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is also a limited partner of the Operating Partnership. Between its general partner and limited partner interests, the Company held a 92.86% majority ownership interest therein as of September 30, 2007. The remaining ownership interests in the Operating Partnership (including Preferred OP Units) of 7.14% are held by certain former owners of assets acquired by the Operating Partnership, which includes a director and certain officers of the Company.

The minority interest in the Operating Partnership represents OP Units that are not owned by the Company. In conjunction with the formation of the Company and as a result of subsequent acquisitions, certain persons and entities contributing interests in properties to the Operating Partnership received limited partnership units in the form of either OP Units or Contingent Conversion Units. Limited partners who received OP Units in the formation transactions or in exchange for contributions for interests in properties have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their OP Units for cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock at the time of the redemption. Alternatively, the Company may, at its option, elect to acquire those OP Units in exchange for shares of its common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to anti-dilution adjustments provided in the Operating Partnership agreement.

As of September 30, 2007, the Operating Partnership had 4,032,577 and 154,109 OP Units and CCUs outstanding, respectively.

Unlike the OP Units, CCUs do not carry any voting rights. Upon the achievement of certain performance thresholds relating to 14 early-stage lease-up properties, all or a portion of the CCUs will be automatically converted into OP Units. Initially, each CCU will be convertible on a one-for-one basis into OP Units, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. Beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and ending with the quarter ending December 31, 2008, the Company will calculate the net operating income from the 14 wholly-owned early-stage lease-up properties over the 12-month period ending in such quarter. Within 35 days following the end of each quarter referred to above, some or all of the CCUs will be converted so that the total percentage (not to exceed 100%) of CCUs issued in connection with the formation transactions that have been converted to OP Units will be equal to the percentage determined by dividing the net operating income for such period in excess of $5.1 million by $4.6 million. If

any CCUs remain unconverted through the calculation made in respect of the 12-month period ending December 31, 2008, such outstanding CCUs will be cancelled.

While any CCUs remain outstanding, a majority of the Company’s independent directors must review and approve the net operating income calculation for each measurement period and also must approve any sales of any of the 14 wholly-owned early-stage lease-up properties.

As of September 30, 2007, there were 45,937 CCUs converted to OP Units. Based on the performance of the properties as of September 30, 2007, an additional 24,677 CCUs became eligible for conversion. The board of directors approved the conversion of these CCUs on November 1, 2007 as per the Company’s charter, and the units were issued on November 5, 2007.

17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On September 28, 2007, in connection with an amendment to the Contribution Agreement (see Note 15) the Company amended its charter to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock of the Company from 200,000,000 to 300,000,000. The Company’s charter now provides that it can issue up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 4,100,000 Contingent Conversion Shares, $.01 par value per share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. As of September 30, 2007, 65,276,108 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, 2,995,845 CCSs were issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding. All stockholders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends and to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.

Unlike the Company’s shares of common stock, CCSs do not carry any voting rights. Upon the achievement of certain performance thresholds relating to 14 early-stage lease-up properties, all or a portion of the CCSs will be automatically converted into shares of the Company’s common stock. Initially, each CCS will be convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. Beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and ending with the quarter ending December 31, 2008, the Company will calculate the net operating income from the 14 wholly-owned early-stage lease-up properties over the 12-month period ending in such quarter. Within 35 days following the end of each quarter referred to above, some or all of the CCSs will be converted so that the total percentage (not to exceed 100%) of CCSs issued in connection with the formation transactions that have been converted to common stock will be equal to the percentage determined by dividing the net operating income for such period in excess of $5.1 million by $4.6 million. If any CCSs remain unconverted through the calculation made in respect of the 12-month period ending December 31, 2008, such outstanding CCSs will be cancelled and restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock.

While any CCSs remain outstanding, a majority of the Company’s independent directors must review and approve the net operating income calculation for each measurement period and also must approve any sales of any of the 14 wholly-owned early-stage lease-up properties.

As of September 30, 2007, there were 892,998 CCSs converted to common stock. Based on the performance of the properties as of September 30, 2007, an additional 479,730 CCSs became eligible for conversion. The board of directors approved the conversion of these CCSs on November 1, 2007 as per the Company’s charter, and the shares were issued on November 5, 2007.

On October 29, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase in the Company’s annual dividend to $1.00 per common share to be paid quarterly at the rate of $0.25 per common share starting in the fourth quarter of 2007.

18. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Options

The Company has the following two stock option plans under which shares were available for grant at September 30, 2007: 1) the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, and 2) the 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Share Plan. Under the terms of the plans, the exercise price of an option is the fair value of the stock on the date of grant. Each option becomes exercisable after the period or periods specified in the award agreement, which generally do not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. Options are exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as determined by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee; options may not be exercised if such exercise would cause a violation of the ownership limit in the Company’s charter. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance

Committee at the time of grant, stock options vest ratably over a four-year periodbeginning on the date of grant.

The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007		2006

Expected volatility	24	%	24	%
Dividend yield	5.8	%	6.4	%
Risk-free interest rate	4.2	%	4.6	%
Average expected term (years)	5		5

The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option. The Company uses actual historical data to calculate the expected price volatility and average expected term. The forfeiture rate, which is estimated at a weighted average of 20.65% of unvested options outstanding as of September 30, 2007, is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.

The following table summarizes the Company’s activities with respect to its stock option plans:

Options	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value as of September 30, 2007
Outstanding at December 31, 2006	2,564,563		$	13.92
Granted	418,000		18.51
Exercised	(99,290	)	13.55
Forfeited	(161,609	)	14.56
Outstanding at September 30, 2007	2,721,664		$	14.55	7.54	$	3,757,019

Vested and Expected to Vest	2,085,677		$	14.28	7.41	$	3,192,279
Ending Exercisable	1,345,343		$	13.59	7.04	$	2,522,751

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2007. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.

The Company recorded compensation expense relating to outstanding options of $252 and $187 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $670 and $637 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company received cash from the exercise of options of $306 and $871 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1,339 and $1,029 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At September 30, 2007, there was $1,219 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options under the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.11 years. The valuation model applied in this calculation utilizes subjective assumptions that could potentially change over time, including the expected forfeiture rate. Therefore, the amount of unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 2007, noted above does not necessarily represent the expense that will ultimately be realized by the Company in the Statement of Operations.

Common Stock Granted to Employees

Common stock is granted to certain employees without monetary consideration under the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. At the date of grant, the recipient has all rights of a stockholder including the right to vote and

receive dividends subject to restrictions on transfer and forfeiture provisions. The forfeiture and transfer restrictions on the shares lapse over a two to four year period beginning on the date of grant.

The Company recorded compensation expense relating to outstanding shares of common stock granted to employees of $485 and $174 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $941 and $740 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The fair value of common stock awards is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. A summary of the Company’s employee share grant activity is as follows:

Restricted Stock Grants	Shares		Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Unreleased at December 31, 2006	156,300		$	15.94
Granted	119,329		18.21
Released	(57,875	)	15.69
Cancelled	(2,607	)	18.70
Unreleased at September 30, 2007	215,147		$	17.26

19. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in two distinct segments: (1) property management, acquisition and development and (2) rental operations. Financial information for the Company’s business segments is set forth below:

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Balance Sheet
Investment in real estate ventures
Rental operations	$	89,876	$	88,115

Total assets
Property management, acquisition and development	$	324,056	$	223,402
Rental operations	1,695,519		1,446,423
	$	2,019,575	$	1,669,825

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Statement of Operations
Total revenues
Property management, acquisition and development	$	8,617		$	6,506		$	24,320		$	19,212
Rental operations	55,209			44,682			149,832			125,877
	$	63,826		$	51,188		$	174,152		$	145,089

Operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization
Property management, acquisition and development	$	11,217		$	9,020		$	32,626		$	28,959
Rental operations	29,895			25,641			81,460			73,581
	$	41,112		$	34,661		$	114,086		$	102,540

Income (loss) before interest, Preferred Operating Partnership, minority interests and equity in earnings of real estate ventures
Property management, acquisition and development	$	(2,600	)	$	(2,514	)	$	(8,306	)	$	(9,747	)
Rental operations	25,314			19,041			68,372			52,296
	$	22,714		$	16,527		$	60,066		$	42,549

Interest expense
Property management, acquisition and development	$	(376	)	$	(297	)	$	(940	)	$	(683	)
Rental operations	(15,703		)	(13,132		)	(43,972		)	(37,515		)
	$	(16,079	)	$	(13,429	)	$	(44,912	)	$	(38,198	)

Interest income
Property management, acquisition and development	$	1,821		$	175		$	6,937		$	805

Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Unit holder
Property management, acquisition and development	$	1,280		$	—		$	1,280		$	—

Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Partnership units
Property management, acquisition and development	$	1,054		$	—		$	1,054		$	—

Minority interests - Operating Partnership and other
Property management, acquisition and development	$	(756	)	$	(306	)	$	(1,615	)	$	(585	)

Equity in earnings of real estate ventures
Rental operations	$	1,304		$	1,340		$	3,693		$	3,566

Net income (loss)
Property management, acquisition and development	$	423		$	(2,942	)	$	(1,590	)	$	(10,210	)
Rental operations	10,915			7,249			28,093			18,347
	$	11,338		$	4,307		$	26,503		$	8,137

Depreciation and amortization expense
Property management, acquisition and development	$	310		$	225		$	912		$	608
Rental operations	10,288			9,028			27,605			26,978
	$	10,598		$	9,253		$	28,517		$	27,586

Statement of Cash Flows
Acquisition of real estate assets
Property management, acquisition and development							$	(144,347	)	$	(127,826	)

Development and construction of real estate assets
Property management, acquisition and development							$	(31,495	)	$	(26,301	)

20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has guaranteed three construction loans for unconsolidated partnerships that own development properties in Baltimore, Maryland, Chicago, Illinois and Sacramento, California. These properties are owned by joint ventures in which the Company has 10%-50% equity interests. These guarantees were entered into in November 2004, July 2005, and August 2007, respectively. At September 30, 2007, the total amount of guaranteed mortgage debt relating to these joint ventures was $13,179. These mortgage loans mature December 1, 2007 and July 28, 2008, respectively. If the joint ventures default on the loans, the Company may be forced to repay the loans. Repossessing and/or selling the self-storage facilities and land that collateralize the loans could provide funds sufficient to reimburse the Company. The estimated fair market value of the encumbered assets at September 30, 2007, was $22,167. The Company has recorded no liability in relation to this guarantee as of September 30, 2007. The fair value of the guarantee is not material. To date, the joint ventures have not defaulted on their mortgage debt. The Company believes the risk of having to perform on the guarantee is remote.

The Company has been involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As of September 30, 2007, the Company was not involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, was any material litigation threatened against it, or its properties.

21. INCOME TAXES

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, there were no material unrecognized tax benefits. At September 30, 2007, there were no material unrecognized tax benefits.

Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized in income tax expense when incurred. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had no interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The tax years 2003-2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 4, 2007, the Company purchased one property located in California for $10,775.

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Amounts in thousands, except property and per share data

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our “Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” and the “Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in this report and the “Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company makes statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this Form 10-Q entitled “Statement on Forward-Looking Information.” Amounts are in thousands (except per share data and unless otherwise stated).

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report and the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 describe the significant accounting policies essential to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Preparation of our financial statements requires estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions which we have used are appropriate and correct based on information available at the time that they were made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect our reported assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenue and expense during the period presented. If there are material differences between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual facts, our financial statements may be affected.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require our judgment in its application. There are areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result, however, there are some areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would produce a materially different result. See the notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements that contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Topic D-109, “Determining the Nature of a Host Contract Related to a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share under FASB Statement No. 133” (“Topic D-109”), discussed at the March 15, 2007 EITF meeting, is effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2007 (even if that period is other than the first fiscal quarter of the registrant’s fiscal year). Topic D-109 provides the SEC staff’s view as to how one must evaluate whether a preferred stock “host” contract is a debt host or an equity host. It states that the determination of the nature of the host contract for a hybrid financial instrument (that is, whether the nature of the host contract is more akin to debt or to equity) issued in the form of a share should be based on a consideration of economic characteristics and risks. The SEC staff believes that the consideration of the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract should be based on all the stated and implied substantive terms and features of the hybrid financial instrument. This may represent a change from the way these instruments were analyzed in the past.

We elected to early adopt Topic D-109 which specifically relates to the AAAAA Rent-A-Space acquisition that was completed during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

OVERVIEW

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust formed to continue the business commenced in 1977 by our predecessor company to own, operate, manage, acquire and develop self-storage properties. We derive a majority of our revenues from rents received from tenants under existing leases at each of our self-storage properties. Additional revenue is derived from management and franchise fees from our joint venture and managed properties. We operate in competitive markets where consumers have multiple self-storage properties from which to choose. Competition has and will continue to impact our results. We experience minor seasonal fluctuations in occupancy levels, with occupancy levels higher in the summer months due to increased rental activity.

Our operating results depend materially on our ability to lease available self-storage space and on the ability of our tenants to make required rental payments. We believe we are able to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local, regional and national economic conditions by centrally adjusting rental rates through the combination of our revenue management team and our industry-leading technology systems.

We continue to evaluate a range of growth initiatives and opportunities including the following:

• Maximize the performance of properties through strategic, efficient and proactive management. We plan to pursue revenue generating and expense minimizing opportunities in our operations. Our revenue management team will seek to maximize revenue by responding to changing market conditions through our technology system’s ability to provide real-time, interactive rental rate and discount management. Our size and scale give us a greater ability than the majority of our competitors to implement national, regional and local marketing programs, which we believe will attract more customers to our stores at a lower net cost.

• Focus on the acquisition of self-storage properties from strategic partners and third parties. Our acquisitions team will continue to pursue the acquisition of single properties and multi-property portfolios that we believe can provide stockholder value. Our July 2005 acquisition of Storage USA bolstered our reputation as a reliable, ethical buyer, which we believe enhances our ability to negotiate and close acquisitions. In addition, our status as an UPREIT enables flexibility when structuring deals.

• Develop new self-storage properties. We have several joint venture and wholly-owned development properties and will continue to develop new self-storage properties in our core markets. Our development pipeline for the remainder of 2007 through 2008 includes 17 projects. The majority of the projects will be developed on a wholly-owned basis by the Company. The construction of most of these properties has already begun.

• Expand the Company’s management business. We see the management business as a future acquisition pipeline and expect to pursue strategic relationships with owners that should strengthen our acquisition pipeline through agreements which give us first right of refusal to purchase the managed property in the event of a potential sale. Twelve of the Company’s 2006 and 15 of the Company’s 2007 acquisitions have come from this channel.

PROPERTIES

As of September 30, 2007, we owned or had ownership interests in 585 operating self-storage properties located in 33 states and Washington, D.C. Of these properties, 251 are wholly-owned and consolidated, one is held in joint venture and consolidated and 333 are held in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method. In addition, we managed 59 properties for franchisees or third parties bringing the total numbers of properties which we own and/or manage to 644. We receive a management fee of approximately 6% of gross revenues to manage the joint venture, third party and franchise sites. As of September 30, 2007, we owned or had ownership interests in approximately 43 million square feet of space and had greater than 300,000 customers.

Approximately 70% of our properties are clustered around the larger population centers, such as Atlanta, Baltimore/Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, St. Petersburg/Tampa and San Francisco. These markets contain above-average population and income demographics for new self-storage properties. The clustering of assets around these population centers enables us to reduce our operating costs through economies of scale.

We consider a property to be in the lease-up stage after it has been issued a certificate of occupancy, but before it has achieved stabilization. We consider a property to be stabilized once it has achieved either an 80% occupancy rate for a full year measured as of January 1, or has been open for three years. Although leases are short-term in duration, the typical tenant tends to remain at our properties for an extended period of time. For properties that were stabilized as of September 30, 2007, the median length of stay was approximately eleven months.

Our property portfolio is a made up of different types of construction and building configurations depending on the site and the municipality where it is located. Most often sites are what we consider “hybrid” facilities, a mix of both drive-up buildings and multi-floor buildings. We have a number of multi-floor buildings with elevator access only, and a number of facilities featuring ground-floor access only.

The following table sets forth additional information regarding the occupancy of our stabilized properties on a state-by-state basis as of September 30, 2007 and 2006. The information as of September 30, 2006 is on a pro forma basis as though all the properties owned at September 30, 2007 were under the Company’s control as of September 30, 2006.

Stabilized Property Data Based on Location


		Actual	Pro forma	Actual	Pro forma	Actual		Pro forma
Location	Number of Properties	Number of Units as of Sept. 30, 2007(1)	Number of Units as of Sept. 30, 2006	Net Rentable Square Feet as of Sept. 30, 2007(2)	Net Rentable Square Feet as of Sept. 30, 2006	Square Foot Occupancy % Sept. 30, 2007		Square Foot Occupancy % Sept. 30, 2006
Wholly-owned properties
Alabama	1	592	607	76,105	76,135	76.4	%	71.3	%
Arizona	4	2,263	2,255	279,540	278,670	94.8	%	94.6	%
California	41	34,064	33,923	3,240,997	3,226,675	83.2	%	83.8	%
Colorado	6	2,944	2,967	359,741	351,491	87.9	%	90.2	%
Connecticut	1	745	745	62,505	62,430	86.1	%	82.8	%
Florida	27	17,725	17,694	1,880,350	1,874,521	85.5	%	89.6	%
Georgia	12	6,445	6,474	835,386	835,233	87.5	%	87.2	%
Hawaii	2	2,890	2,860	150,536	154,413	81.4	%	82.4	%
Illinois	4	2,674	2,681	263,389	264,857	89.9	%	88.2	%
Indiana	1	589	590	62,250	62,250	93.9	%	91.8	%
Kansas	1	504	502	49,940	49,940	90.1	%	92.3	%
Kentucky	3	1,588	1,579	194,420	194,325	92.8	%	90.1	%
Louisiana	2	1,407	1,411	147,690	147,690	89.5	%	94.8	%
Maryland	9	7,447	7,377	793,436	768,576	85.8	%	83.8	%
Massachusetts	24	13,506	13,458	1,432,706	1,428,285	84.0	%	84.1	%
Michigan	2	1,040	1,043	134,882	135,312	87.1	%	83.5	%
Missouri	6	3,177	3,169	375,582	375,702	85.9	%	86.8	%
Nevada	2	1,255	1,238	132,565	130,655	84.9	%	89.2	%
New Hampshire	2	1,007	1,006	125,909	125,609	80.2	%	83.4	%
New Jersey	21	17,099	17,113	1,669,753	1,671,116	85.5	%	87.5	%
New Mexico	1	503	534	61,690	67,770	89.8	%	95.3	%
New York	7	6,953	6,958	456,269	455,529	83.3	%	82.7	%
Ohio	4	2,031	2,046	273,876	276,201	87.4	%	88.3	%
Oregon	1	764	767	103,450	103,610	89.8	%	91.9	%
Pennsylvania	8	6,141	6,135	641,727	637,231	85.7	%	84.9	%
Rhode Island	1	728	728	75,601	75,241	85.9	%	86.1	%
South Carolina	4	2,067	2,068	245,734	245,734	93.0	%	93.4	%
Tennessee	6	3,533	3,534	477,227	474,512	84.7	%	89.5	%
Texas	19	11,874	11,959	1,337,314	1,322,511	90.7	%	87.1	%
Utah	3	1,533	1,529	210,540	210,140	96.2	%	94.7	%
Virginia	4	2,889	2,890	272,824	272,677	85.3	%	84.8	%
Washington	3	2,031	2,030	244,865	244,595	94.6	%	96.1	%
Total Wholly-Owned Stabilized	232	160,008	159,870	16,668,799	16,599,636	86.2	%	86.8	%


		Actual	Pro forma	Actual	Pro forma	Actual		Pro forma
Location	Number of Properties	Number of Units as of Sept. 30, 2007(1)	Number of Units as of Sept. 30, 2006	Net Rentable Square Feet as of Sept. 30, 2007(2)	Net Rentable Square Feet as of Sept. 30, 2006	Square Foot Occupancy % Sept. 30, 2007		Square Foot Occupancy % Sept. 30, 2006
Joint-venture properties
Alabama	3	1,708	1,723	205,638	205,443	87.4	%	88.6	%
Arizona	11	6,897	6,894	751,156	751,266	91.8	%	93.3	%
California	72	51,821	51,868	5,315,985	5,317,230	89.6	%	88.6	%
Colorado	2	1,335	1,337	158,263	158,113	84.5	%	85.1	%
Connecticut	8	5,979	5,977	690,724	689,464	76.3	%	79.9	%
Delaware	1	589	589	71,655	71,655	93.5	%	88.6	%
Florida	24	20,360	20,338	2,090,368	2,079,201	84.6	%	87.2	%
Georgia	3	1,887	1,916	246,406	251,530	86.6	%	83.6	%
Illinois	6	4,020	4,026	432,517	435,592	81.5	%	77.0	%
Indiana	8	3,151	3,145	406,503	406,323	89.3	%	91.3	%
Kansas	3	1,214	1,214	163,030	163,900	85.3	%	90.8	%
Kentucky	4	2,285	2,279	268,427	268,479	88.1	%	87.5	%
Maryland	13	10,224	10,216	1,013,413	1,012,618	88.2	%	85.4	%
Massachusetts	16	8,491	8,550	972,570	974,811	83.6	%	82.9	%
Michigan	10	5,959	5,954	783,993	785,122	88.1	%	78.9	%
Missouri	2	951	947	118,195	117,935	88.0	%	75.7	%
Nevada	7	4,629	4,643	620,299	621,916	90.5	%	89.4	%
New Hampshire	3	1,322	1,324	137,714	138,004	84.4	%	88.9	%
New Jersey	20	15,150	15,133	1,593,358	1,588,876	81.7	%	87.8	%
New Mexico	8	4,198	4,200	462,160	462,644	84.1	%	84.9	%
New York	21	22,154	22,111	1,719,892	1,716,170	88.5	%	85.5	%
Ohio	11	5,023	5,032	750,287	753,052	84.6	%	85.0	%
Oregon	2	1,292	1,288	137,140	137,140	91.4	%	94.8	%
Pennsylvania	9	6,472	6,482	687,858	687,420	85.5	%	84.7	%
Rhode Island	1	610	611	73,880	73,905	73.6	%	67.3	%
Tennessee	22	11,817	11,839	1,548,693	1,550,247	86.8	%	87.0	%
Texas	18	11,835	11,856	1,519,536	1,518,084	81.6	%	79.4	%
Utah	1	520	522	59,500	59,400	94.9	%	89.1	%
Virginia	15	10,404	10,380	1,106,550	1,106,646	86.9	%	83.6	%
Washington	1	551	551	62,730	62,730	94.2	%	89.7	%
Washington, DC	1	1,536	1,536	102,003	101,990	92.4	%	87.8	%
Total Stabilized Joint-Ventures	326	224,384	224,481	24,270,443	24,266,906	86.4	%	85.9	%

Managed properties
California	5	3,272	3,270	401,555	400,355	79.3	%	82.2	%
Colorado	1	513	513	56,240	56,240	91.6	%	88.3	%
Florida	1	572	569	56,725	56,685	94.7	%	96.5	%
Georgia	7	4,532	4,555	485,544	488,730	88.4	%	85.6	%
Maryland	3	3,123	3,093	256,586	256,146	84.5	%	81.4	%
Nevada	1	435	440	61,235	61,235	81.2	%	81.0	%
New Jersey	2	1,098	1,090	131,472	131,542	91.5	%	90.2	%
New Mexico	2	1,576	1,584	171,555	171,355	87.5	%	90.2	%
Pennsylvania	2	889	889	131,130	131,330	92.1	%	87.4	%
Tennessee	2	1,147	1,150	135,410	135,710	92.4	%	89.6	%
Texas	1	371	371	46,955	46,955	99.4	%	98.8	%
Utah	2	1,434	1,434	136,477	146,687	87.3	%	78.4	%
Washington, DC	2	1,255	1,256	111,759	111,809	85.2	%	83.0	%
Total Stabilized Managed Properties	31	20,217	20,214	2,182,643	2,194,779	86.9	%	85.4	%

Total Stabilized Properties	589	404,609	404,565	43,121,885	43,061,321	86.4	%	86.2	%

(1) Represents unit count as of September 30, 2007, which may differ from September 30, 2006 unit count due to unit conversions or expansions.

(2) Represents net rentable square feet as of September 30, 2007, which may differ from September 30, 2006 net rentable square feet due to unit conversions or expansions.

The following table sets forth additional information regarding the occupancy of our lease-up properties on a state-by-state basis as of September 30, 2007 and 2006. The information as of September 30, 2006 is on a pro forma basis as though all the properties owned at September 30, 2007 were under our control as of September 30, 2006.

Lease-up Property Data Based on Location


		Actual	Pro forma	Actual	Pro forma	Actual		Pro forma
Location	Number of Properties	Number of Units as of Sept. 30, 2007(1)	Number of Units as of Sept. 30, 2006	Net Rentable Square Feet as of Sept. 30, 2007(2)	Net Rentable Square Feet as of Sept. 30, 2006	Square Foot Occupancy % Sept. 30, 2007		Square Foot Occupancy % Sept. 30, 2006
Wholly-owned properties
Arizona	1	586	599	67,375	67,375	78.2	%	52.2	%
California	5	3,639	2,787	433,850	329,960	62.6	%	63.4	%
Colorado	1	358	365	58,928	60,441	84.4	%	73.1	%
Connecticut	1	612	612	60,760	60,560	77.0	%	74.0	%
Florida	2	1,257	973	157,155	133,880	76.3	%	75.7	%
Illinois	1	592	589	75,800	75,810	77.3	%	68.5	%
Massachusetts	4	2,898	2,292	286,237	219,303	69.9	%	63.3	%
New Jersey	2	1,745	1,695	163,260	149,395	81.6	%	81.7	%
Pennsylvania	1	423	425	46,910	47,410	80.8	%	61.5	%
Washington	1	506	528	61,250	61,250	93.1	%	86.2	%
Total Wholly-Owned Lease-up	19	12,616	10,865	1,411,525	1,205,384	72.8	%	68.8	%

Joint-venture properties
California	1	701	—	78,672	—	39.3	%	0.0	%
Illinois	1	955	957	74,153	74,558	54.4	%	18.7	%
Maryland	1	948	957	73,672	73,649	57.2	%	21.3	%
New Jersey	2	1,196	560	119,735	62,400	57.2	%	76.3	%
New Mexico	1	495	530	77,406	58,992	95.6	%	93.3	%
Pennsylvania	1	753	767	76,496	76,773	93.6	%	82.0	%
Virginia	1	878	878	84,383	84,383	82.6	%	66.3	%
Total Lease-up Joint-Ventures	8	5,926	4,649	584,517	430,755	68.0	%	58.3	%

Managed properties
California	8	5,425	4,793	552,315	460,915	75.7	%	68.7	%
Connecticut	1	683	696	54,840	55,260	71.7	%	55.7	%
Florida	3	2,076	1,297	224,265	112,646	61.7	%	61.7	%
Georgia	2	974	1,029	115,265	114,740	75.3	%	69.1	%
Illinois	2	1,562	1,575	190,399	190,509	71.9	%	58.5	%
Indiana	1	566	586	68,690	68,690	83.9	%	63.5	%
Maryland	1	727	728	67,810	67,560	89.2	%	75.8	%
Massachusetts	4	3,847	3,864	337,234	339,454	67.5	%	51.3	%
New Jersey	1	862	—	78,030	—	26.8	%	0.0	%
New York	1	1,578	1,579	116,305	116,310	79.7	%	73.3	%
Rhode Island	1	501	506	55,670	56,095	35.5	%	24.1	%
Texas	2	1,158	1,172	125,305	124,445	86.4	%	70.2	%
Virginia	1	687	679	74,840	74,860	85.0	%	75.7	%
Total Lease-up Managed	28	20,646	18,504	2,060,968	1,781,484	71.4	%	62.9	%

Total Lease-up Properties	55	39,188	34,018	4,057,010	3,417,623	71.4	%	64.4	%

(1) Represents unit count as of September 30, 2007, which may differ from September 30, 2006 unit count due to unit conversions or expansions.

(2) Represents net rentable square feet as of September 30, 2007, which may differ from September 30, 2006 net rentable square feet due to unit conversions or expansions.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

Overview

Results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 include the operations of 585 properties (252 of which were consolidated and 333 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method) compared to the results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, which included the operations of 561 properties (213 of which were

consolidated and 348 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method).

Revenues

The following table sets forth information on revenues earned for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended September 30,									Nine months ended September 30,
	2007		2006		$ Change			% Change		2007		2006		$ Change			% Change
Revenues:
Property rental	$	55,209	$	44,682	$	10,527		23.6	%	$	149,832	$	125,877	$	23,955		19.0	%
Management and franchise fees	5,169		5,357		(188		)	(3.5	)%	15,520		15,697		(177		)	(1.1	)%
Tenant insurance	3,027		716		2,311			322.8	%	7,858		2,608		5,250			201.3	%
Development fees	97		47		50			106.4	%	334		272		62			22.8	%
Other income	324		386		(62		)	(16.1	)%	608		635		(27		)	(4.3	)%
Total revenues	$	63,826	$	51,188	$	12,638		24.7	%	$	174,152	$	145,089	$	29,063		20.0	%

Property Rental — The increase in property rental revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 consists of $9,214 and $18,455, respectively, associated with acquisitions completed in 2007 and 2006, $825 and $4,218, respectively, from rate increases at stabilized properties, and $488 and $1,282, respectively, from increases in occupancy at lease-up properties.

Management and Franchise Fees — Revenue from management and franchise fees have remained fairly stable. Increased revenues at our joint venture, franchise, and third-party managed sites related to rental rate and occupancy increases have been offset by lost management fees due to the termination of certain management agreements.

Tenant Insurance —The increase in tenant insurance revenues is due to the introduction of our captive insurance program at all wholly-owned properties in October 2006. Formerly, insurance revenues included only fee income paid by a third party insurance company. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we promoted the tenant insurance program and successfully increased sales of insurance policies in excess of 40% over the same period in 2006.

Expenses

The following table sets forth information on expenses for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended September 30,									Nine months ended September 30,
	2007		2006			$ Change		% Change		2007		2006		$ Change		% Change
Expenses:
Property operations	$	19,607	$	16,613		$	2,994	18.0	%	$	53,855	$	46,603	$	7,252	15.6	%
Tenant insurance	1,397		284			1,113		391.9	%	3,587		1,506		2,081		138.2	%
Unrecovered development and acquisition costs	184		(87		)	271		(311.5	)%	593		255		338		132.5	%
General and administrative	9,326		8,598			728		8.5	%	27,534		26,590		944		3.6	%
Depreciation and amortization	10,598		9,253			1,345		14.5	%	28,517		27,586		931		3.4	%
Total expenses	$	41,112	$	34,661		$	6,451	18.6	%	$	114,086	$	102,540	$	11,546	11.3	%

Property Operations — The increase in property operations expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 consists of $2,983 and $6,040, respectively, associated with acquisitions completed in 2007 and 2006, and $11 and $1,212, respectively, from increases in general operating expenses including property taxes and insurance at existing properties.

Tenant Insurance —The increase in tenant insurance expense is due to the introduction of our captive insurance program at all wholly-owned properties in October 2006. The increase in tenant insurance expense correlates directly to the increase in sales of tenant insurance premiums.

Unrecovered Development/Acquisition Costs—Unrecovered development and acquisition costs have increased when compared to the prior year due to an increase in acquisition volume and competition for raw land and operating properties.

General and Administrative—General and administrative costs remained relatively constant for the periods presented. The slight increase in general and administrative expense is due to additional support personnel being added as a result of our

acquisition and development volume.

Depreciation and Amortization —Depreciation and amortization expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased due to additional properties being added through acquisition and development. These increases were offset by the customer relationship intangibles related to the Storage USA acquisition being fully amortized in January 2007.

Other Revenues and Expenses

The following table sets forth information on other revenues and expenses for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended September 30,											Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006			$ Change			% Change		2007			2006			$ Change			% Change
Other revenue and expenses:
Interest expense	$	(16,079	)	$	(13,429	)	$	(2,650	)	19.7	%	$	(44,912	)	$	(38,198	)	$	(6,714	)	17.6	%
Interest income	1,821			175			1,646			940.6	%	6,937			805			6,132			761.7	%
Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Unit holder	1,280			—			1,280			100.0	%	1,280			—			1,280			100.0	%
Equity in earnings of real estate ventures	1,304			1,340			(36		)	(2.7	)%	3,693			3,566			127			3.6	%
Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Partnership units	1,054			—			1,054			100.0	%	1,054			—			1,054			100.0	%
Minority interest - Operating Partnership	(869		)	(306		)	(563		)	184.0	%	(1,768		)	(585		)	(1,183		)	202.2	%
Minority interest - other	113			—			113			100.0	%	153			—			153			100.0	%
Total other expense	$	(11,376	)	$	(12,220	)	$	844		(6.9	)%	$	(33,563	)	$	(34,412	)	$	849		(2.5	)%

Interest Expense — The increase in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 when compared to September 30, 2006 consists of $888 and $3,850, respectively, related to new loans on properties acquired in 2007 and 2006, and $1,340 and $2,561, respectively, related to increased corporate interest related primarily to the exchangeable senior notes offering in March 2007.

Interest Income — The increase in interest income was due to the larger amount of cash and short-term investments held during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the prior year. The excess cash was generated primarily by the exchangeable senior notes offering in March 2007.

Interest Income on note receivable from Preferred Unit holder — Represents interest on a $100 million loan to the holders of the Preferred OP Units. The funds were loaned on June 25, 2007 and bear interest at 4.85% payable quarterly.

Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Ventures — The change in equity in earnings of real estate ventures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 relates to increases in income at the properties owned by the real estate ventures. The increases were partially offset by the losses on certain lease-up properties held in joint ventures.

Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Partnership units — This amount is a one-time adjustment that represents the change in fair value of the embedded derivative associated with the Preferred OP Units between the original issuance of the Preferred OP Units (June and August, 2007) and the completion of the amendment to the agreement that was signed on September 28, 2007.

Minority Interest — Operating Partnership—Income allocated to the Operating Partnership represents 7.14% (including the Preferred OP Units) and 8.13% of the net income before minority interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in the amount allocated to the minority interest in 2007 is due to the increase in net income.

Distributions to Preferred Operating Partnership Units

The fixed distribution to the Preferred OP Units of $1,510 represents the portion of the distribution related to the $115.0 million of Preferred OP Units that bears a fixed priority return of 5%. This amount was included on the income statement as a one-time adjustment related to the accounting for the Preferred OP Units prior to the signing of the amended contribution agreement that was filed on September 28, 2007. In future periods, all distributions paid to the Preferred OP Unit holders will be recorded as part of minority interest represented by the Preferred OP Units.

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net income and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results. We believe FFO is a meaningful disclosure as a supplement to net earnings. Net earnings assume that the values of real estate assets diminish predictably over time as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. The values of real estate assets fluctuate due to market conditions and we believe FFO more accurately reflects the value of our real estate assets. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) as net income computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), excluding gains or losses on sales of operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be considered along with the reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. The following table sets forth the calculation of FFO (dollars are in thousands, except for share data):

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006		2007			2006
Net income available to common stockholders	$	9,828		$	4,307	$	24,993		$	8,137

Adjustments:
Real estate depreciation	8,874			6,945		24,290			20,066
Amortization of intangibles	1,263			1,944		2,877			6,448
Joint venture real estate depreciation and amortization	1,004			1,144		3,091			3,600
Joint venture loss on sale of properties	15			—		20			—
Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units	(1,054		)	—		(1,054		)	—
Income allocated to Operating Partnership minority interest	869			306		1,768			585

Funds from operations	$	20,799		$	14,646	$	55,985		$	38,836

Weighted average number of shares - diluted	70,567,078			57,072,838		69,702,837			56,250,164

SAME-STORE STABILIZED PROPERTY RESULTS

We consider our same-store stabilized portfolio to consist of only those properties which were wholly-owned at the beginning and at the end of the applicable periods presented that have achieved stabilization as of the first day of such period. The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store portfolio. We consider the following same-store presentation to be meaningful in regards to the properties shown below. These results provide information relating to property-level operating changes without the effects of acquisitions or completed developments.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Percent		Nine Months Ended September 30,						Percent
	2007			2006			Change		2007			2006			Change
Same-store rental revenues	$	40,440		$	39,312		2.9	%	$	118,974		$	114,060		4.3	%
Same-store operating expenses	13,972			14,086			(0.8	)%	41,491			40,916			1.4	%
Same-store net operating income	26,468			25,226			4.9	%	77,483			73,144			5.9	%

Non same-store rental revenues	14,769			5,370			175.0	%	30,858			11,817			161.1	%
Non same-store operating expenses	5,635			2,527			123.0	%	12,364			5,687			117.4	%

Total rental revenues	55,209			44,682			23.6	%	149,832			125,877			19.0	%
Total operating expenses	19,607			16,613			18.0	%	53,855			46,603			15.6	%

Same-store square foot occupancy as of quarter end	86.8		%	88.0		%			86.8		%	88.0		%

Properties included in same-store	181			181					181			181

The increase in same-store rental revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was due to our ability to maintain occupancy and increase rental rates to existing customers. The decrease in same-store operating expenses for the threee months ended September 30, 2007 was primarily due to decreases in utilities and repairs and maintenance. These decreases were partially offset by increases to property insurance. The increase in same-store operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was primarily due to increases in property taxes and insurance.

COMMON CONTINGENT SHARES AND COMMON CONTINGENT UNIT PROPERTY PERFORMANCE

As described in the notes to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, upon the achievement of certain levels of net operating income with respect to 14 of our pre-stabilized properties, our contingent conversion shares (“CCS”) and our Operating Partnership’s contingent conversion units (“CCU”) will convert into additional shares of common stock and OP Units, respectively.

As of September 30, 2007, 892,998 CCSs and 45,937 CCUs had converted to common shares and common OP units, respectively. Based on the performance of the properties as of September 30, 2007, an additional 479,730 CCSs and 24,677 CCUs became eligible for conversion. The board of directors approved the conversion of these CCSs and CCUs on November 1, 2007 as per the Company’s charter, and the shares and units were issued on November 5, 2007.

The table below outlines the performance of the properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Percent		Nine Months Ended September 30,				Percent
	2007		2006		Change		2007		2006		Change
CCS/CCU rental revenues	$3,094		$2,718		13.8	%	$8,946		$7,608		17.6	%
CCS/CCU operating expenses	1,341		1,540		(12.9	)%	3,973		4,195		(5.3	)%
CCS/CCU net operating income	1,753		1,178		48.8	%	4,973		3,413		45.7	%

Non CCS/CCU rental revenues	52,115		41,964		24.2	%	140,886		118,269		19.1	%
Non CCS/CCU operating expenses	18,266		15,073		21.2	%	49,882		42,408		17.6	%

Total rental revenues	55,209		44,682		23.6	%	149,832		125,877		19.0	%
Total operating expenses	19,607		16,613		18.0	%	53,855		46,603		15.6	%

CCS/CCU square foot occupancy as of quarter end	80.8	%	75.3	%			80.8	%	75.3	%

Properties included in CCS/CCU	14		14				14		14

The increase in CCS/CCU rental revenues for the periods presented was due to increased rental rates and occupancy. The decrease in CCS/CCU operting expenses for the periods presented was due to a decrease in advertising.

CASH FLOWS

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $78,852 and $60,716, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to an increase in net income related to the addition of new properties through acquisitions and interest income from short-term investments.

Cash used in investing activities was $221,007 and $158,146, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The increase is due primarily to the acquisition of properties and the purchase of short-term investments during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Cash provided by financing activities was $113,184 and $220,463 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 consisted of the issuance of exchangeable senior notes for $250,000, note receivable issued to a Preferred OP Unit holder of $100,000, additional net borrowings of $11,227, and $44,218 paid in dividends. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we issued equity for net proceeds of $194,901, and had additional net borrowings of $63,014, offset by $35,407 paid in dividends.

OPERATIONAL SUMMARY

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we continued our same-store property revenue growth with a revenue increase of 2.9% and 4.3%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006. Occupancy at our stabilized properties was fairly consistent on a year-to-year basis, reaching 86.8% as of September 30, 2007 compared to 88.0% as of September 30, 2006.

Property revenue growth was evident in the majority of markets in which we operate. The growth in property revenue is the result of increases in occupancy and rental rates to both new and existing customers. Property expenses increased primarily as a result of increases in property taxes due to re-assessments on properties that we have acquired and other annual tax re-assessments.

OUTLOOK

In the third quarter, we continued to see a generally positive climate for self-storage in the United States. Rental activity was flat overall when compared with the third quarter of 2006. Despite the lack of increased demand, we were able to raise same-store and overall portfolio revenue through increased rental rates to existing customers. The key economic indicators that affect self-storage demand are mixed, and we continue to look at monthly rental activity as an indicator of demand.

We seek to drive rental activity and revenue growth by actively managing both pricing and promotional strategies through our revenue management team and utilizing the yield management features of our technology system. In-house training, operational initiatives and marketing promotions continue to be implemented. These activities also provide support for increased rentals at the store level.

Our discounting strategies continue to evolve. Higher levels of discounting were utilized in the first nine months of 2007 compared to 2006. We will selectively discount certain sites and units based on occupancy, availability, and competitive parameters that are controlled through our centralized, real-time technology systems and revenue management team.

Property taxes are a primary driver of expenses for the coming year. As we acquire existing self-storage facilities, tax reassessments will continue to occur. Snow removal expenses, usually a major contributor to expense increases, were lower in the first nine months of 2007 due to lower snowfall amounts in the northeast and mid-Atlantic regions.

We anticipate continued competition from all operators, both public and private, in all of the markets in which we operate. However, we believe that the quality and location of our property portfolio, our revenue management systems, and the strength of our self-storage fundamentals will provide opportunities to grow revenues in the remainder of 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of September 30, 2007, we had $41,830 available in cash and cash equivalents and $49,200 in short-term investments. We intend to use this cash to purchase additional self-storage properties and fund other working capital needs during the remainder of 2007. Additionally, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders on an annual basis to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Therefore, it is unlikely that we will have any substantial cash balances that could be used to meet our liquidity needs. Instead, these needs must be met from cash generated from operations and external sources of capital.

During September 2004, we, as guarantor, and our Operating Partnership entered into a $100.0 million revolving line of credit (“Credit Facility”), which included a $10.0 million swingline subfacility. The Credit Facility was collateralized by self-storage properties. No amounts were outstanding on the line of credit at September 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006 and the Credit Facility expired on September 30, 2007.

On October 19, 2007, we entered into a new $100.0 million revolving line of credit (the “Credit Line”). We intend to use the proceeds of the Credit Line for general corporate purposes and acquisitions. The Credit Line has an interest rate of between 100 and 250 basis points over LIBOR, depending on certain financial ratios of the Company. The Credit Line is collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets. As of the closing date, the Credit Line had approximately $97 million of capacity based on the assets collateralizing the Credit Line. The Credit Line matures October 31, 2010.

As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately $1.3 billion of debt, resulting in a debt to total capitalization ratio of 54.0%. As of September 30, 2007, the ratio of total fixed rate debt and other instruments to total debt was 92.7%. The weighted average interest rate of the total of fixed and variable rate debt at September 30, 2007 was 5.1%.

Real estate assets are pledged as collateral for our debt. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to our outstanding debt. We were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2007.

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity requirements, including operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, dividends to stockholders, distributions to holders of Operating Partnership units and interest on our outstanding indebtedness out of our operating cash flow, cash on hand, short-term investments and borrowings under our Credit Line.

Long-Term Liquidity Needs

Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of distributions to stockholders and OP unit holders, new facility development, property acquisitions, principal payments under our borrowings and non-recurring capital expenditures. We do not expect that our operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund our long term liquidity needs and instead expect to fund such needs out of additional borrowings, joint ventures with third parties, and from the proceeds of public and private offerings of equity and debt. We may also use Operating Partnership units as currency to fund acquisitions from self-storage owners who desire tax-deferral in their exiting transactions.

On October 13, 2005, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permits us to sell, from time to time, up to $800 million of our common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants and rights to the extent necessary or advisable to meet our liquidity needs. We have issued approximately $406 million of securities under this shelf registration statement to date, leaving us with availability of approximately $394 million.

FINANCING STRATEGY

We will continue to employ leverage in our capital structure in amounts determined from time to time by our board of directors. Although our board of directors has not adopted a policy which limits the total amount of indebtedness that we may incur, we will consider a number of factors in evaluating our level of indebtedness from time to time, as well as the amount of such indebtedness that will be either fixed or variable rate. In making financing decisions, our board of directors will consider factors including but not limited to:

• the interest rate of the proposed financing;

• the extent to which the financing impacts flexibility in managing our properties;

• prepayment penalties and restrictions on refinancing;

• the purchase price of properties acquired with debt financing;

• long-term objectives with respect to the financing;

• target investment returns;

• the ability of particular properties, and the Company as a whole, to generate cash flow sufficient to cover expected debt service payments;

• overall level of consolidated indebtedness;

• timing of debt and lease maturities;

• provisions that require recourse and cross-collateralization;

• corporate credit ratios including debt service coverage, debt to total capitalization and debt to undepreciated assets; and

• the overall ratio of fixed and variable-rate debt.

Our indebtedness may be recourse, non-recourse or cross-collateralized. If the indebtedness is non-recourse, the collateral will be limited to the particular properties to which the indebtedness relates. In addition, we may invest in properties subject to existing loans collateralized by mortgages or similar liens on our properties, or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis. We may use the proceeds from any borrowings to refinance existing indebtedness, to refinance investments, including the redevelopment of existing properties, for general working capital or to purchase additional interests in partnerships or joint ventures or for other purposes when we believe it is advisable.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Except as disclosed in the notes to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such entities often referred to as structured finance or special purposes entities, which typically are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, except as disclosed in the notes to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitments or intent to provide funding to any such entities. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships.

Our exchangeable senior notes provide for excess exchange value to be paid in cash or shares of our common stock if our stock price exceeds a certain amount. See the notes to our financial statements for a further description of our exchangeable senior notes.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2007:

	Payments due by Period:
			Less Than						After
	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		5 Years
Operating leases	$	62,376	$	5,282	$	10,165	$	8,357	$	38,572
Notes payable, exchangeable senior notes and notes payable to trusts
Interest	456,847		65,041		112,116		68,606		211,084
Principal	1,272,520		4,513		423,263		82,879		761,865
Total contractual obligations	$	1,791,743	$	74,836	$	545,544	$	159,842	$	1,011,521

SEASONALITY

The self-storage business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. A greater portion of revenues and profits are realized from May through September. Historically, our highest level of occupancy has been as of the end of July, while our lowest level of occupancy has been in late February and early March. Results for any quarter may not be indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our future income, cash flows and fair values of financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

As of September 30, 2007, we had $1.3 billion in total debt of which $92.9 million was subject to variable interest rates (including the $61.8 million on which we have a reverse interest rate swap). If LIBOR were to increase or decrease by 100 basis points, the increase or decrease in interest expense on the variable rate debt would increase or decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $0.9 million annually.

Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur. Further, in the event of a change of significant magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

The fair value of fixed rate notes payable and notes payable to trusts at September 30, 2007 was $1.2 billion. The carrying value of these fixed rate notes payable at September 30, 2007 was $1.2 billion.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(i) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

We have a disclosure committee to ensure that all disclosures made by the Company to its security holders or the investment community will be accurate and complete and fairly present the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in all material respects, and are made on a timely basis as required by applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange requirements.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

(ii) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during our most recent quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various litigation and proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We are not a party to any material litigation or legal proceedings, or to the best of our knowledge, any threatened litigation or legal proceedings, which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations either individually or in the aggregate.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

As described in the notes to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, upon the achievement of certain levels of net operating income with respect to 14 of our pre-stabilized properties, our CCSs and our Operating Partnership’s CCUs will convert into additional shares of common stock and Operating Partnership units, respectively. Subject to certain lock-up periods and adjustments, the units are generally exchangeable for shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis or an equivalent amount of cash, at the option of the Company.

As of September 30, 2007, 892,998 CCSs and 45,937 CCUs had converted to common shares and common Operating Partnership units, respectively. Based on the performance of the properties as of September 30, 2007, an additional 479,730 CCSs and 24,677 CCUs became eligible for conversion. The board of directors approved the conversion of these CCS and CCUs on November 1, 2007 as per the Company’s charter, and the shares and units were issued on November 5, 2007. The shares and units were issued in private placements in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. We received no additional consideration for the

conversions.

On August 1, 2007, one property was contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for consideration totaling $14.7 million. Preferred OP Units of 80,905 with a value of $9.8 million were issued along with cash of approximately $4.9 million. The units were issued in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Subject to certain lock-up periods and adjustments, the Preferred OP Units will be redeemable at the option of the holder on or after September 1, 2008, which redemption obligation may be satisfied, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of its common stock.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits

3.1		Articles of Amendment, dated September 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2007).

10.1		First Amendment to Contribution Agreement and to Agreement Regarding Transfer of Series A Units among Extra Space Storage LP, various limited partnerships affiliated with AAAAA Rent-A-Space, H. James Knuppe and Barbara Knuppe, dated September 28, 2007. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2007).

10.2		2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement

10.3		First Amendment to Extra Space Storage Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan

10.4		First Amendment to Extra Space Storage Inc. 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Share Plan

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this quarterly report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Extra Space Storage Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.
	Registrant

Date: November 7, 2007	/s/ Kenneth M. Woolley
	Kenneth M. Woolley
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 7, 2007	/s/ Kent W. Christensen
	Kent W. Christensen
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

Exhibit 10.2

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

2004 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT by and between EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”) and (the “Grantee”), dated as of , 20 .

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Extra Space Storage Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) (capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto by the Plan);

WHEREAS, the Grantee is an employee of the Company; and

WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to grant Restricted Stock to the Grantee pursuant to the Plan and subject to the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Grant of Restricted Stock.

The Company hereby grants the Grantee Shares of Restricted Stock of the Company, subject to the following terms and conditions and subject to the provisions of the Plan. The Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein in its entirety.

2. Restrictions and Conditions.

The Restricted Stock awarded pursuant to this Agreement and the Plan shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions:

(i) Subject to the provisions of the Plan and this Agreement, during the period of restriction with respect to Shares granted hereunder (the “Restriction Period”), the Grantee shall not be permitted voluntarily or involuntarily to sell, transfer, pledge, anticipate, alienate, encumber or assign the Shares (or have such Shares attached or garnished). Subject to clauses (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi) below, the Restriction Period shall begin on the date hereof and lapse on the following schedule:

Date Restriction Lapses		Number of Shares

Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise expressly provided by the Committee, the Restriction Period with respect to such Shares shall only lapse as to whole Shares.

(ii) Except as provided in the foregoing clause (i), below in this clause (ii) or in the Plan, the Grantee shall have, in respect of the Shares of Restricted Stock, all of the rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote the Shares and the right to receive dividends. Certificates for Shares (not subject to restrictions under the Plan) shall be delivered to the Grantee or his or her designee promptly after, and only after, the Restriction Period shall lapse without forfeiture in respect of such Shares of Restricted Stock.

(iii) Subject to clauses (iv), (v) and (vi) below, if the Grantee has a Termination of Service by the Company and its Subsidiaries or by the Grantee for any reason, during the Restriction Period, then all Shares still subject to restriction shall thereupon, and with no further action, be forfeited by the Grantee.

(iv) Cessation of service as an employee shall not be treated as a cessation of employment for purposes of this paragraph 2 if the Grantee continues without interruption to serve thereafter as an officer or Director of the Company or in such other capacity as determined by the Company, and the termination of such successor service shall be treated as the applicable termination.

(v) If the Grantee is party to an employment agreement which provides that Shares subject to restriction shall be subject to terms other than those set forth above, the terms of such employment agreement shall apply with respect to the Shares granted hereby and shall, to the extent applicable, supersede the terms hereof.

(vi) In the event that a Change of Control occurs during the Restriction Period, then all restrictions on Shares shall thereupon, and with no further action immediately lapse.

3. Certain Terms of Shares.

(a) In the discretion of the Company, each Grantee of Restricted Stock may be issued a stock certificate in respect of Shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan. A “book entry” (by computerized or manual entry) shall be made in the records of the Company to evidence an award of Restricted Stock, where no certificate is issued in the name of the Grantee. Each certificate, if any, shall be registered in the name of the Grantee and may include any legend which the Company deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer under this Agreement or the Plan, or as the Company may otherwise deem appropriate, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall bear a legend referring to the terms,

conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Award, substantially in the following form:

THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES OF STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS (INCLUDING FORFEITURE) OF THE EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC. 2004 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN AND AN AWARD AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE REGISTERED OWNER AND EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC. COPIES OF SUCH PLAN AND AWARD AGREEMENT ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICES OF EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC. AT 2795 EAST COTTONWOOD PARKWAY, SUITE 400, SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121.

(b) The Committee shall require that any stock certificates evidencing such Shares be held in custody by the Company until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed, and may in its discretion require that, as a condition of any Restricted Stock award, the Grantee shall have delivered to the Company a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to the stock covered by such Award. If and when such restrictions so lapse, any stock certificates shall be delivered by the Company to the Grantee or his or her designee.

4. Miscellaneous.

(a) THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW WHICH COULD CAUSE THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANY JURISDICTION OTHER THAN THE STATE OF MARYLAND.

(b) The captions of this Agreement are not part of the provisions hereof and shall have no force or effect. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and legal representatives. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

(c) The Committee may make such rules and regulations and establish such procedures for the administration of this Agreement as it deems appropriate. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may interpret the Plan and this Agreement, with such interpretations to be conclusive and binding on all persons and otherwise accorded the maximum deference permitted by law, provided that the Committee’s interpretation shall not be entitled to deference on and after a Change in Control except to the extent that such interpretations are made exclusively by members of the Committee who are individuals who served

as Committee members before the Change in Control and take any other actions and make any other determinations or decisions that it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the Plan, this Agreement or the administration or interpretation thereof. In the event of any dispute or disagreement as to interpretation of the Plan or this Agreement or of any rule, regulation or procedure, or as to any question, right or obligation arising from or related to the Plan or this Agreement, the decision of the Committee, except as provided above, shall be final and binding upon all persons.

(d) All notices hereunder shall be in writing, and if to the Company or the Committee, shall be delivered to the Board or mailed to its principal office, addressed to the attention of the Board; and if to the Grantee, shall be delivered personally, sent by facsimile transmission or mailed to the Grantee at the address appearing in the records of the Company. Such addresses may be changed at any time by written notice to the other party given in accordance with this paragraph 4(d).

(e) The failure of the Grantee or the Company to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Agreement or the Plan, or to assert any right the Grantee or the Company, respectively, may have under this Agreement or the Plan, shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such provision or right or any other provision or right of this Agreement or the Plan.

(f) Nothing in this Agreement shall confer on the Grantee any right to continue in the employ or other service of the Company or its Subsidiaries or interfere in any way with the right of the Company or its Subsidiaries and their shareholders to terminate the Grantee’s employment or other service at any time.

(g) This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, with respect thereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Grantee have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

	EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

	By:
	Name:
	Title:


	Grantee:

Exhibit 10.3

FIRST AMENDMENT

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

2004 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

WHEREAS, Extra Space Storage Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Extra Space Storage Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations; and

WHEREAS, the Board of the Company desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of Fair Market Value for purposes of determining option exercise prices and other purposes under the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, effective November 7, 2007, the definition of “Fair Market Value” as contained in Section 1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

“Fair Market Value” per Share as of a particular date means (i) if Shares are then listed on a national stock exchange, the closing sales price per Share on the exchange for the relevant date, or if no sales of Shares occurred on the relevant date, then the closing sales price per Share on the next preceding date on which there was a sale of Shares on such exchange, as determined by the Committee, (ii) if Shares are not then listed on a national stock exchange but are then traded on an over-the-counter market, the average of the closing bid and asked prices for the Shares in such over-the-counter market on the relevant date, or if no trading in the Shares occurred on the relevant date, then the closing sales price per Share on the next preceding date on which there was trading of Shares, as determined by the Committee, or (iii) if Shares are not then listed on a national stock exchange or traded on an over-the-counter market, such value as the Committee in its discretion may in good faith determine; provided that, where the Shares are so listed or traded, the Committee may make such discretionary determinations where the Shares have not been traded for 10 or more trading days.”

Except to the extent herein above set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of November 7, 2007.

	EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

	By:

	Title:

Exhibit 10.4

FIRST AMENDMENT

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

2004 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ SHARE PLAN

WHEREAS, Extra Space Storage Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Extra Space Storage Inc. 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Share Plan (the “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations; and

WHEREAS, the Board of the Company desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of Fair Market Value for purposes of determining option exercise prices under the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, effective November 7, 2007, the definition of “Fair Market Value” as contained in Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

Except to the extent herein above set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of November 7, 2007.

	EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

	By:

	Title:

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth M. Woolley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extra Space Storage Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2007	By:	/s/ Kenneth M. Woolley
	Name: Kenneth M. Woolley
	Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kent W. Christensen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extra Space Storage Inc.;

(d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2007	By:	/s/ Kent W. Christensen
	Name: Kent W. Christensen
	Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S. C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Extra Space Storage Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

	By:	/s/ Kenneth M. Woolley
	Name: Kenneth M. Woolley
	Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	November 7, 2007

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Extra Space Storage Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

	By:	/s/ Kent W. Christensen
	Name: Kent W. Christensen
	Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	November 7, 2007